Model decision table

Rankings with the tradeoffs left in.

Scan the full catalog, narrow it to your workload, and compare up to three models. Specifications are source-reviewed; fit scores are editorial and their weighting is explicit.

Reviewed 2026-08-1925 models9 providers
Full catalog

Compare models

Showing 25 models

Compare#ModelEditorial fitCodingReasoningTool useContextPrice / 1M tokensEvidence
01
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · AvailableComplex production workflows · Coding
9.9editorial9.99.99.91.05M$10$45Tier caveat
02
Claude Fable 5Anthropic · AvailableLong-running agents · Highest-capability tasks
9.9editorial9.99.99.81M$10$50
03
Claude Opus 5Anthropic · AvailableComplex reasoning · Long-running agents
9.9editorial9.99.99.81M$5$25
04
GPT-5.5OpenAI · AvailableComplex reasoning · Coding
9.8editorial9.89.89.71M$5$30
05
Grok 4.6xAI · AvailableAgentic coding · Knowledge work
9.8editorial9.89.89.7500K$2$6Tier caveat
06
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · AvailableComplex reasoning · Agentic coding
9.8editorial9.89.89.61M$5$25
07
Grok 4.5xAI · AvailableAgentic coding · Knowledge work
9.7editorial9.79.79.6500K$2$6Tier caveat
08
GPT-5.4OpenAI · AvailableCoding · Agents
9.7editorial9.89.59.71M$2.5$15
09
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · AvailableProduction agents · Coding
9.6editorial9.69.69.71.05M$4$18Tier caveat
10
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle · AvailableAgentic coding · Multimodal reasoning
9.6editorial9.69.59.61.05M$0.75$3.75Tier caveat
11
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · AvailableBalanced performance · Production workloads
9.5editorial9.69.59.31M$2$10Tier caveat
12
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI · AvailableCoding-focused tasks · Type inference
9.5editorial9.79.39.4400K$1.75$14
13
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · AvailableAgentic coding · Multimodal tasks
9.5editorial9.59.49.51M$1.5$7.5Tier caveat
14
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle · AvailableFast multimodal agents · Search grounding
9.4editorial9.49.49.41M$1.5$9Tier caveat
15
Kimi K3Moonshot AI · AvailableLong-horizon coding · Knowledge work
9.3editorial9.49.39.21M$3$15Tier caveat
16
GLM-5.3Z.ai · AvailableComplex software engineering · Long-context analysis
9.3editorial9.39.39.21M$1.4$4.4Tier caveat
17
GPT-5.2OpenAI · AvailableGeneral-purpose · Balanced tasks
9.2editorial9.39.29.0400K$1.75$14
18
GPT-OSS-120BOpenAI · AvailableSelf-hosted · Privacy
9.2editorial9.39.29.0128K$0$0Tier caveat
19
GLM-5Zhipu AI · AvailableBilingual (CN/EN) · Value-focused
9.2editorial9.29.39.0200K$1$3.2
20
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · AvailableHigh-volume workflows · Subagents
9.1editorial9.19.19.31.05M$0.4$1.8Tier caveat
21
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek · AvailableBudget coding · High-volume
9.1editorial9.19.28.91M$0.44$1.32Tier caveat
22
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral · AvailableEuropean compliance · Agentic coding
9.0editorial9.19.18.9256K$1.5$7.5
23
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek · AvailableLow-cost agent experiments · Responses API
8.9editorial8.98.98.91M$0.14$0.28Tier caveat
24
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · AvailableFast responses · High-volume tasks
8.8editorial8.98.88.7200K$1$5
25
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle · AvailableHigh-volume automation · Subagents
8.8editorial8.88.78.91M$0.3$2.5Tier caveat
Score methodology

Orientation, not manufactured certainty.

The editorial fit score weights coding at 40%, reasoning at 35%, and tool use at 25%. It is a compact decision aid built from the dimensions tracked in this catalog—not a claim that one model is universally best.

Prices show input then output cost per one million tokens. Provider tiers, caching, batches, and hosts can change the actual bill. Open the evidence links and caveat labels before committing to a production choice.

Inspect the source log and review policy →