GPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.6
Complete benchmark comparison on coding, reasoning, tool use, cost, and latency. Updated March 2026.
GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
by OpenAI
Coding 9.6
Reasoning 9.5
Tool Use 9.5
Input $1.75 / 1M tokens
Output $14 / 1M tokens
Context 400K
Strengths
- Best coding performance
- Strong agentic capabilities
- Excellent tool integration
- 400K context
Weaknesses
- Higher cost for output
- Newer model, less battle-tested
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)
by Anthropic
Coding 9.6
Reasoning 9.7
Tool Use 9.4
Input $18.75 / 1M tokens
Output $93.75 / 1M tokens
Context 200K
Strengths
- Top-tier intelligence
- Adaptive thinking
- Best for complex reasoning
- Prompt caching
Weaknesses
- Most expensive
- 200K context limit vs GPT-5.2
🏆 The Verdict
GPT-5.2 wins on coding by a hair, but both are exceptional. Choose GPT-5.2 for coding/agentic work, Claude for deep reasoning and analysis.
Best for Coding: GPT-5.2 ✓ WIN Best for Reasoning: Claude Opus 4.6 ✓ WIN Best for Agents: GPT-5.2 ✓ WIN Best for Cost: GPT-5.2 ✓ WIN