GPT-5.4
OpenAI
$2.5/$15 per 1M tokens- Strong coding performance
- Excellent tool integration
- Strong agentic capabilities
Model comparison
GPT vs Gemini for Developers
GPT is the stronger default for coding agents and tool-heavy workflows. Gemini is compelling for long-context analysis and cost-sensitive multimodal work.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Best long-context handling
- Strong multimodal
- Competitive pricing
Head-to-head scorecard
| Dimension | GPT-5.4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Practical read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 9.8 | 9.5 | Use this row as a directional signal, then test on your own eval set. |
| Reasoning | 9.5 | 9.5 | Tie or depends on workload. |
| Tool use | 9.7 | 9.3 | Use this row as a directional signal, then test on your own eval set. |
| Input cost / 1M | $2.5 | $2 | Use this row as a directional signal, then test on your own eval set. |
| Output cost / 1M | $15 | $12 | Use this row as a directional signal, then test on your own eval set. |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | Tie or depends on workload. |
Which should you pick?
- Pick GPT-5.4 when you need Coding or Agents.
- Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need Multimodal tasks or Long context.
- Run your own 10-task eval before standardizing. Public leaderboards are useful filters, not final answers.