Home Models Compare Scorecards Evals Methodology FAQ
← Back to all evals
OpenAI o1 vs Claude 4: Which Model for Complex Reasoning?

OpenAI o1 vs Claude 4: Which Model for Complex Reasoning?


OpenAI’s o1 (Strawberry) and Claude 4 take different approaches to reasoning. We tested both on complex engineering problems to see which delivers better results.

How They Work

  • o1 — Uses internal chain-of-thought reasoning, “thinking” before responding
  • Claude 4 — Direct response with extensive context window

Test Results

Task 1: Debug Distributed System Issue

Prompt: Three services are logging connection timeouts to Redis. Services A, B, C all fail independently. Debug.

ModelScoreRoot CauseSolution
o19.3✓ Identified network partitionComprehensive
Claude 49.1✓ Identified connection poolGood

Task 2: Design Event Sourcing System

Prompt: Design an event sourcing architecture for an e-commerce order system.

ModelScoreCompletenessPracticality
o19.0GoodGood
Claude 49.4ExcellentExcellent

Claude 4 provided better schema design and migration strategy.

Task 3: Optimize Slow SQL Query

Prompt: This query takes 30 seconds. Optimize it.

ModelScoreOptimizationIndexes
o18.9GoodMissing 1
Claude 49.2ExcellentComplete

Speed

ModelTime (avg)Think Time
o112s8s
Claude 44s0s

o1 is significantly slower due to reasoning.

Cost

ModelPrice
o1$15.00/1M
Claude 4$15.00/1M

Same price tier.

When to Use What

  • Use o1 for: Math, science, complex logic
  • Use Claude 4: Coding, writing, general reasoning

Both are excellent. Claude 4 is faster and better for coding.